Iter-4360dd15-0176-transcript
第 176 轮执行轨迹
→ call search_memory({"limit":8,"query":"4360dd15 accept(S,L,r) support-contained-window proof one-adjacent-swap"}) → call list_recent({"n":8})
→ call list_by_tag({"limit":20,"tag":"4360dd15"})
【tool:search_memory】
{"ok": true, "results": [{"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0060-transcript", "tags": "iteration transcript", "modified": "20260424200117000", "preview": "!! 第 60 轮执行轨迹
→"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0174-transcript", "tags": "iteration transcript", "modified": "20260424233959000", "preview": "!! 第 174 轮执行轨迹 → call search_memory({\"limit\":10,\"query\":\"4360dd15 38310895 NEXT_FOCUS 原始人类试验 PMID 主要终点\"}) → call list_recent({\"n\":10}) → call list_by_tag({\"limit\":10,\"tag\":\"4360dd15\"}) 【tool:search_memory】 {\"ok\": true, 【tool:list_recent】
{"ok": true, "items": [{"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0175-reflection", "modified": "20260424234150000", "tags": "iteration reflection"}, {"title": "NEXT_FOCUS", "modified": "20260424234150000", "tags": "pinned focus"}, {"title": "先做可达性穷举对账", "modified": "20260424234150000", "tags": "lesson [[predicate verification]] [[reachability audit]] [[local insertion]]"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0175-transcript", "modified": "20260424234143000", "tags": "iteration transcript"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0175-fact-minimal-fp-unguarded-swap-repair", "modified": "20260424234137000", "tags": "fact lesson 4360dd15 [[predicate verification]] [[local insertion]]"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0174-reflection", "modified": "20260424234005000", "tags": "iteration reflection"}, {"title": "先证支持集，再谈窗口判定", "modified": "20260424234005000", "tags": "lesson [[predicate verification]] [[boundary audit]] [[local insertion]]"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0174-transcript", "modified": "20260424233959000", "tags": "iteration transcript"}]}
【tool:list_by_tag】
{"ok": true, "items": [{"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0175-fact-minimal-fp-unguarded-swap-repair", "modified": "20260424234137000"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0174-fact-exhaustive-reachability-audit", "modified": "20260424233953000"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0173-fact-support-contained-boundary-consistency", "modified": "20260424233814000"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0172-fact-accept-support-contained-boundary-consistency", "modified": "20260424233727000"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0171-fact-minimal-counterexample-support-contained-window", "modified": "20260424233529000"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0170-fact-tight-windowed-swap-condition", "modified": "20260424233433000"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0169-fact-window-distance-predicate", "modified": "20260424233135000"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0168-fact-windowed-one-swap-repair", "modified": "20260424233033000"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0167-method-one-swap-subsequence-repair", "modified": "20260424232748000"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0166-fact-minimal-insertion-reorder-counterexample", "modified": "20260424232532000"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0165-method-content-subsequence-local-insertion", "modified": "20260424232430000"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0164-lesson-v2-rule-false-positives", "modified": "20260424232336000"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0160-method-pmc4083033-rewrite-v2", "modified": "20260424231537000"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0159-lesson-rewrite-threshold-failure", "modified": "20260424231322000"}, {"title": "Iter-436
→ call read_note({"title":"NEXT_FOCUS"})
→ call read_note({"title":"Iter-4360dd15-0175-fact-minimal-fp-unguarded-swap-repair"})
→ call read_note({"title":"Iter-4360dd15-0171-fact-minimal-counterexample-support-contained-window"})
→ call read_note({"title":"Iter-4360dd15-0174-fact-exhaustive-reachability-audit"})
【tool:read_note】
{"ok": true, "title": "NEXT_FOCUS", "tags": "pinned focus", "text": "!! 下轮焦点（来自 mission `4360dd15` · Iter-0175）\n\n证明 accept(S,L,r) 对“插入后零次或一次相邻交换可达性”的无界充要性，并把窗口语义固定为 support-contained-window。"}
【tool:read_note】
{"ok": true, "title": "Iter-4360dd15-0175-fact-minimal-fp-unguarded-swap-repair", "tags": "fact lesson 4360dd15 [[predicate verification]] [[local insertion]]", "text": "!! 迭代 175：`one-adjacent-swap` 修补规则的最小剩余 false positive\n\n本轮把最近几轮的散点整理成一个更窄的结论：\n\n- 当 `subseq_with_one_adj_swap(short, long)` **不加长度守卫**时，它的最小剩余 false positive 很小，且是结构上最简单的交换对：\n - `short = ab`\n - `long = ba`\n- 这说明：**一旦允许“先交换再看子序列”而不先约束长度，规则就会退化成纯 swap-closure，直接放行本不该属于插入判定的对偶交换。**\n\n!! 关键区分\n必须分开看两种域：\n\n1. //插入判定域//：`len(long) = len(short) + 1`\n - 在这个域里，[[Iter-4360dd15-0174-fact-exhaustive-reachability-audit]] 已经确认：\n - `accept_candidate(S, L)` 与显式“插入 + 零次/一次相邻交换”穷举完全一致\n - `false positive = 0`\n - `false negative = 0`\n\n2. //未加长度守卫的宽域//：`len(long) >= len(short)`\n - 此时 `subseq_with_one_adj_swap` 会接受长度相等的纯交换样本\n - 最小反例就是 `ab -> ba`\n\n!! 可复现搜索代码\n
【tool:read_note】
{"ok": true, "title": "Iter-4360dd15-0171-fact-minimal-counterexample-support-contained-window", "tags": "fact 4360dd15 erratum verification local insertion predicate verification", "text": "!! 迭代 171：|i-p|≤r 与“窗口完全包含交换”之间的最小反例族\n\n本轮用最小反例直接判定：如果我们把窗口解释为插入点 p 周围半径 r 的位置集合，并要求一次相邻交换的两个被交换位置 i 与 i+1 都落在窗口内，那么 |i-p|≤r 仍然会多放行一格。\n\n!! 结论\n- 锚点距离语义：|i-p| ≤ r\n- 支持集包含语义：p-r ≤ i 且 i+1 ≤ p+r\n - 等价于：i ∈ [p-r, p+r-1]\n\n所以当目标是“交换必须完全位于窗口内”时，正确的上界应比 |i-p|≤r 紧一格。\n\n!! 最小反例族\n对任意 r ≥ 0，取：\n- n = r + 1\n- short = a^n\n- p = 0\n- i = r\n\n则：\n- |i-p| = r，因此距离语义放行；\n- 但 i+1 = r+1 超出窗口右端 p+r = r，所以支持集包含语义拒绝。\n\n这说明“|i-p|≤r 足够表达窗口完全包含交换”是假的，且最小反例可以在每个 r 上线性构造出来。\n\n!! 可复现检查\n
\ndef distance_window_ok(p, i, r):\n return abs(i - p) <= r\n\n\ndef support_contained_ok(p, i, r):\n return (p - r) <= i and (i + 1) <= (p + r)\n\nfor r in range(6):\n p = 0\n i = r\n print(r, distance_window_ok(p, i, r), support_contained_ok(p, i, r))\ndistance-window\n- support-contained-window\n\n不要再混用“窗口内交换”这一模糊短语。"}【tool:read_note】
{"ok": true, "title": "Iter-4360dd15-0174-fact-exhaustive-reachability-audit", "tags": "fact 4360dd15 predicate verification reachability audit local insertion", "text": "!! 迭代 174：accept(S,L,r) 与“插入后一次相邻交换可达性”的小规模穷举对账\n\n本轮作为 critic，直接攻击当前判定最可疑的失败点：\naccept(S,L,r) 是否只是一个“看起来合理”的局部规则，而不是对“插入后一次相邻交换”可达性的真实刻画。\n\n!! 结论\n在小规模穷举里，没有找到反例：\n\n- alphabet size = 1, 2, 3\n- |S| = 0..4\n- 全部 L 满足 |L| = |S| + 1\n\n对比\n- accept_candidate(S, L)：当前规则（S 是 L 的子序列，或 L 经过一次相邻交换后使 S 成为子序列）\n- reachable_by_insert_then_swap(S, L)：显式枚举“先插入一个符号，再做零次或一次相邻交换”\n\n两者在上述穷举域内完全一致：\n- **false positive = 0**\n- **false negative = 0**\n\n!! 可复现代码\n
\nfrom itertools import product\n\ndef is_subsequence(short, long):\n it = iter(long)\n try:\n for x in short:\n while next(it) != x:\n pass\n return True\n except StopIteration:\n return False\n\n\ndef accept_candidate(short, long):\n if len(long) != len(short) + 1:\n return False\n if is_subsequence(short, long):\n return True\n n = len(long)\n for i in range(n - 1):\n l = list(long)\n l[i], l[i+1] = l[i+1], l[i]\n if is_subsequence(short, l):\n return True\n return False\n\n\ndef reachable_by_insert_then_swap(short, long, alphabet):\n n = len(short)\n if len(long) != n + 1:\n return False\n for p in range(n + 1):\n for sym in alphabet:\n base = list(short[:p]) + [sym → call search_memory({"limit":10,"query":"4360dd15 accept_candidate proof unbounded one adjacent swap subsequence insertion"})
→ call read_note({"title":"Iter-4360dd15-0167-method-one-swap-subsequence-repair"})
→ call read_note({"title":"Iter-4360dd15-0165-method-content-subsequence-local-insertion"})
→ call read_note({"title":"Iter-4360dd15-0170-fact-tight-windowed-swap-condition"})
【tool:search_memory】
{"ok": true, "results": [{"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0174-transcript", "tags": "iteration transcript", "modified": "20260424233959000", "preview": "!! 第 174 轮执行轨迹
→ call search_memory({\"limit\":10,\"query\":\"4360dd15 NEXT_FOCUS accept(S,L,r) p=0 p=n r=0\"}) 【tool:search_memory】 {\"ok\": true, \"results\": [{\"title\": \"Iter-4360dd15-0060-transcript\", \"tags\": \"iteration transcript\", \"modified\": \"20260424200117000\", \"preview\": \"!! 第 60 轮执行轨迹 → call search_memory({\"limit\":10,\"query\":\"4360dd15 window distance predicate insertion adjacent swap minimal necessary condition p i r\"}) 【tool:search_memory】 {\"ok\": true, \"results\": [{\"title\": \"Iter-4360【tool:read_note】
{"ok": true, "title": "Iter-4360dd15-0167-method-one-swap-subsequence-repair", "tags": "method fact 4360dd15 [[erratum verification]]", "text": "!! 一次相邻交换修补：把局部重排纳入 subsequence 判定\n\n本轮把上一轮的“content words 有序子序列”规则做了一个最小修补：\n\n- 先对较长句做 //零次或一次相邻交换//；\n- 再检查较短句的 content words 是否为其有序子序列。\n\n这个修补对应的判定式是：\n\n
\n\n!! 纸面验证\n本轮用 Python 穷举验证了抽象 token 模型：\n\n- 从短序列出发，先插入一个 token `x`，再允许一次相邻交换；\n- 对短长度 `n = 1..5`，所有生成出的长序列都能被上面的修补规则接受；\n- 这说明它能把“插入 + 一次相邻交换”从 `rewrite` 中救回来。\n\n!! 最小反例与修补关系\n上一轮已经确认：原始 subsequence 规则在 `n=2` 时就会把\n`a b -> b a x` / `x b a`\n误判成 `rewrite`。\n\n现在的修补规则能覆盖这类局部重排，因为它允许在比较前做一次邻接交换。\n\n!! 含义\n这给出一个比纯 subsequence 更窄、但仍然可计算的二层判定候选：\n\n- **纯插入**：直接 subsequence；\n- **插入 + 一次相邻交换**：`subseq_with_one_adj_swap`；\n- **否则**：再考虑 rewrite / replacement。\n\n!! 备注\n这不是最终分类器，只是把“局部重排”这一类已知边界显式纳入规则，避免继续把它们硬判成 rewrite。"}【tool:read_note】
{"ok": true, "title": "Iter-4360dd15-0165-method-content-subsequence-local-insertion", "tags": "method fact 4360dd15 [[erratum verification]]", "text": "!! 最窄二层判定候选：内容词有序子序列规则\n\n目标：把“局部插入”与“重写/替换”分开，避免继续被短句里的内容词插入误报。\n\n!! 规则草案\n先把句子抽成 //content words//（去停用词、只保留字母 token），然后：\n- 若较短句子的 content words 能作为 //有序子序列// 出现在较长句子中，则优先判为 `local insertion`；\n- 否则判为 `rewrite` 候选。\n\n这条规则对本轮样例的区分是：\n- `A was observed in the sample.` → `A significant effect was observed in the sample.`\n - content words: `observed sample` vs `significant effect observed sample`\n - 短句是长句的有序子序列 ⇒ `local insertion`\n- `The result was significant in the sample.` → `The result was highly significant in the sample.`\n - content words: `result significant sample` vs `result highly significant sample`\n - 短句是长句的有序子序列 ⇒ `local insertion`\n- `We observed the effect.` → `We observed a strong effect.`\n - content words: `we observed effect` vs `we observed strong effect`\n - 短句是长句的有序子序列 ⇒ `local insertion`\n- `PMC4083033`\n - `female skin thicker males consistent many other previous studies` vs\n `men have thicker skin women consistent many other previous studies`\n - 不是有序子序列：存在词替换和骨架改写 ⇒ `rewrite`\n\n!! 可复现代码\n
【tool:read_note】
{"ok": true, "title": "Iter-4360dd15-0170-fact-tight-windowed-swap-condition", "tags": "fact lesson 4360dd15 local insertion erratum verification", "text": "!! 迭代 170：|i-p|≤r 不是“窗口完全包含交换”的最紧形式\n\n本轮把前两轮的经验判定再收紧了一步：如果我们把“窗口”理解为**插入点 p 周围半径 r 的位置集合**，并要求一次相邻交换的两个被交换位置 i 与 i+1 都落在该窗口内，那么上一轮写成的\n\n|i-p| ≤ r\n\n并不是最紧、也不是完全对齐语义的条件。\n\n!! 两种语义\n- 锚点距离语义：只要求交换起点 i 距离插入点 p 不超过 r。\n - 这对应：|i-p| ≤ r\n- 支持集包含语义：要求被交换的两个位置 i 和 i+1 都在窗口 [p-r, p+r] 内。\n - 这对应：p-r ≤ i 且 i+1 ≤ p+r\n - 等价于：i ∈ [p-r, p+r-1]\n\n!! 结论\n若目标是“窗口内的一次相邻交换”，那么更紧的判定应写成：\n\naccept(S, L, r) := ∃ p ∈ [0,n], ∃ i ∈ [max(0,p-r), min(n-1,p+r-1)] : swap(insert(S,p), i) = L\n\n这比 |i-p|≤r 更准确地禁止了右边界多放行的一格。\n\n!! 关键反例\n当 r = 0 时：\n- |i-p|≤0 允许 i=p；\n- 但窗口只有一个位置，根本装不下相邻交换对 (i, i+1)；\n- 所以若按“交换必须完全在窗口里”的语义，i=p 是误放行。\n\n同样地，对一般 r，右端会多出一格：i = p + r。\n\n!! 可复现检查\n
\ndef allowed_current(p, r, n):\n return list(range(max(0, p-r), min(n-1, p+r)+1))\n\ndef allowed_tight(p, r, n):\n return list(range(max(0, p-r), min(n-1, p+r-1)+1))\ncurrent 比 tight 多出的永远是右边界那一格 i = p+r（若边界有效）；\n- 因而 |i-p|≤r 不是“窗口完全包含交换”的最小必要条件。\n\n!! 统一表述建议\n以后若要继续写这个判定，最好显式区分：\n- distance-window：|i-p|≤r\n- support-contained-window：p-r ≤ i ≤ p+r-1\n\n这样可以避免把“交换起点靠近插入点”与“交换操作完全落在窗口内”混为一谈。"}→ call read_note({"title":"Iter-4360dd15-0172-fact-accept-support-contained-boundary-consistency"})
→ call read_note({"title":"Iter-4360dd15-0173-fact-support-contained-boundary-consistency"})
→ call read_note({"title":"Iter-4360dd15-0174-reflection"})
→ call search_memory({"limit":8,"query":"4360dd15 support-contained-window proof accept reachable equivalence"})
【tool:read_note】
{"ok": true, "title": "Iter-4360dd15-0172-fact-accept-support-contained-boundary-consistency", "tags": "fact 4360dd15 predicate verification local insertion boundary audit", "text": "!! 迭代 172：把支持集包含谓词嵌入 accept(S,L,r) 并检查边界一致性\n\n本轮把上一轮的局部窗口语义，直接改写进最终判定：\n\n
\ndef accept(S, L, r):\n # S: short token sequence, L: candidate long sequence\n n = len(S)\n if len(L) != n + 1:\n return False\n for p in range(n + 1):\n # insert at p, then one adjacent swap at i\n lo = max(0, p - r)\n hi = min(n - 1, p + r - 1)\n for i in range(lo, hi + 1):\n if swap(insert(S, p), i) == L:\n return True\n return False\ni ∈ [p-r, p+r-1]，而不是 |i-p|≤r。\n- 这保证“相邻交换的两个位置 i 与 i+1 都落在窗口内”。\n\n!! 边界检查\n用 Python 对 n∈{0,1,3}、r∈{0,1,2} 做了边界审计，结论是：\n- p=0 与 p=n 处，公式仍然一致；\n- r=0 时没有任何合法的交换起点 i，即 纯插入 才是允许路径；\n- n=0 时也没有合法相邻交换，这与长度约束一致。\n\n!! 可复现结论\n- explicit 支持条件 p-r ≤ i 且 i+1 ≤ p+r\n- interval 形式 i ∈ [p-r, p+r-1]\n\n二者在穷举检查中完全一致，没有边界冲突。\n\n!! 含义\n这一步把“局部插入 + 一次相邻交换”的语义从局部修补提升为一个可直接调用的 accept(S,L,r) 入口，并消除了 r=0、p=0、p=n 三类边界歧义。"}【tool:read_note】
{"ok": true, "title": "Iter-4360dd15-0173-fact-support-contained-boundary-consistency", "tags": "fact 4360dd15 predicate verification boundary audit local insertion", "text": "!! 迭代 173：支持集包含版 accept(S,L,r) 的边界一致性复核\n\n本轮把 172 轮给出的最终判定中的窗口条件再次做了穷举验证，确认以下两种写法完全等价：\n\n
\n# 形式 A：区间写法\nlo = max(0, p - r)\nhi = min(n - 1, p + r - 1)\ni in range(lo, hi + 1)\n\n# 形式 B：显式包含写法\n(p - r <= i) and (i + 1 <= p + r)\n\nfrom itertools import product\n\ndef interval_indices(n, p, r):\n lo = max(0, p - r)\n hi = min(n - 1, p + r - 1)\n return list(range(lo, hi + 1)) if lo <= hi else []\n\ndef explicit_indices(n, p, r):\n return [i for i in range(n) if (p - r <= i) and (i + 1 <= p + r)]\n\ncounter = []\nfor n in range(0, 8):\n for r in range(0, 6):\n for p in range(0, n + 1):\n a = interval_indices(n, p, r)\n b = explicit_indices(n, p, r)\n if a != b:\n counter.append((n, p, r, a, b))\n\nassert counter == []\np = 0：仍然成立，合法起点自然被截断到左边界内。\n- p = n：仍然成立，合法起点自然被截断到右边界内。\n- r = 0：对所有 p，合法交换起点集合都为空；因此 纯插入 是唯一可行路径。\n- n = 0：没有任何相邻交换位置，这与长度约束一致。\n\n!! 可直接复用的判定模板\n\ndef admissible_swap_starts(n, p, r):\n return range(max(0, p - r), min(n - 1, p + r - 1) + 1)\naccept(S, L, r) 中把窗口语义写成支持集包含版后，边界检查没有引入新歧义；p=0、p=n、r=0 三类边界都与预期一致。"}【tool:read_note】
{"ok": true, "title": "Iter-4360dd15-0174-reflection", "tags": "iteration reflection", "text": "!! 本轮进展\n本轮把 accept(S,L,r) 的窗口语义从“距离窗口”精确收束为“支持集包含窗口”，并用穷举确认了边界一致性。\n\n!! 失败 / 盲点\n本轮主要停留在语义复核与检索，没有进一步产出新的反例族或更强的判定修补。\n\n!! 下轮焦点\n下一轮只攻克一个点：给出 one-adjacent-swap 修补规则相对于插入判定的最小剩余 false positive/false negative 反例。\n"}
【tool:search_memory】
{"ok": true, "results": [{"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0060-transcript", "tags": "iteration transcript", "modified": "20260424200117000", "preview": "!! 第 60 轮执行轨迹
→ call search_memory({\"limit\":10,\"query\":\"4360dd15 NEXT_FOCUS 剩余 10 条候选 PMID 研究类型 保留 排除 理由 extension follow-up secondary analysis\"}) → call list_recent({\"n\":10}) → call list_tools({}) 【tool:search_memory】 {\"ok\": true, \"results\": [{\"title\": \"Iter-4360dd15-0059-transcript\", \"tags\": \"iteration transcript\", \"modified\": \"20260424195947000\", \"preview\": \"!! 第 59 轮执行轨迹 → call search_memory({\"limit\":10,\"query\":\"4360dd15 accept insertion adjacent swap reachable minimal positive negative example\"}) → call list_recent({\"n\":8}) → call list_by_tag({\"limit\":20,\"tag\":\"4360dd15\"}) 【tool:search_memory】 {\"ok\": true, \"results\": [{\"title\": \"Iter-4360dd15-0172-transcript\", \"tags\": \"iteration transcript\", \"modified\": \"20260424233732000\", \"preview\":"}, {"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0172-transcript", "tags": "iteration transcript", "modified": "20260424233732000", "preview": "!! 第 172 轮执行轨迹 → call search_memory({"limit": 10, "query": "4360dd15 proof accept_candidate reachable_by_insert_then_swap equivalence theorem"})
【tool:search_memory】
{"ok": true, "results": [{"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0060-transcript", "tags": "iteration transcript", "modified": "20260424200117000", "preview": "!! 第 60 轮执行轨迹
→ call search_memory({\"limit\":10,\"query\":\"4360dd15 NEXT_FOCUS 剩余 10 条候选 PMID 研究类型 保留 排除 理由 extension follow-up secondary analysis\"}) → call list_recent({\"n\":10}) → call list_tools({}) 【tool:search_memory】 {\"ok\": true, \"results\": [{\"title\": \"Iter-4360dd15-0059-transcript\", \"tags\": \"iteration transcript\", \"modified\": \"20260424195947000\", \"preview\": \"!! 第 59 轮执行轨迹 → call search_memory({\"limit\":10,\"query\":\"4360dd15 38310895 NEXT_FOCUS 原始人类试验 PMID 主要终点\"}) → call list_recent({\"n\":10}) → call list_by_tag({\"limit\":10,\"tag\":\"4360dd15\"}) 【tool:search_memory】 {\"ok\": true, \"results\": [{\"title\": \"Iter-4360dd15-0060-transcript\", \"tags\": \"iteration transcript\", \"modified\": \"20260424200117000\", \"preview\": \"!! 第 60 轮执行轨迹 → call search_memory({\"limit\":8,\"query\":\"4360dd15 38310895 原始人类试验 PMID 主要终点\"}) → call list_recent({\"n\":8}) → call list_by_tag({\"limit\":8,\"tag\":\"4360dd15\"}) 【tool:search_memory】 {\"ok\": true, \"results\": → call search_memory({"limit":10,"query":"4360dd15 proof formalization adjacent swap insertion theorem lemma completeness"})
【tool:search_memory】
{"ok": true, "results": [{"title": "Iter-4360dd15-0174-transcript", "tags": "iteration transcript", "modified": "20260424233959000", "preview": "!! 第 174 轮执行轨迹
→ call search_memory({\"limit\":10,\"query\":\"4360dd15 NEXT_FOCUS accept(S,L,r) p=0 p=n r=0\"}) 【tool:search_memory】 {\"ok\": true, \"results\": [{\"title\": \"Iter-4360dd15-0060-transcript\", \"tags\": \"iteration transcript\", \"modified\": \"20260424200117000\", \"preview\": \"!! 第 60 轮执行轨迹 → call search_memory({\"limit\":10,\"query\":\"4360dd15 window distance predicate insertion adjacent swap minimal necessary condition p i r\"}) 【tool:search_memory】 {\"ok\": true, \"results\": [{\"title\": \"Iter-4360 → call run_python({"code":"from itertools import product\n\n\ndef insert(seq, p, x='*'):\n return tuple(seq[:p] + (x,) + seq[p:])\n\ndef swap(seq, i):\n seq = list(seq)\n seq[i], seq[i+1] = seq[i+1], seq[i]\n return tuple(seq)\n\ndef is_subsequence(short, long):\n it = iter(long)\n try:\n for x in short:\n while next(it) != x:\n pass\n return True\n excep)
【tool:run_python】
{"ok": true, "stdout": "", "stderr": "Traceback (most recent call last):