公开反馈到衰老研究数据集的最小判定表

公开反馈到衰老研究数据集的最小判定表

''结论'': 对 衰老研究种子数据集的最小可复现构成 而言，公开反馈入口只有在能回到原始论文或数据库时，才算真正补强数据集。

最小判定表

| route | platform primitive | submit condition | evidence sentence | dataset impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PubPeer | post-publication comment / annotation on a specific publication | Target has DOI / PMID / arXiv ID and the feedback is tied to that publication | "This feedback attaches to a specific paper with a stable scholarly identifier, so it can be traced back to the original evidence." | Directly strengthens dataset provenance / notes / evidence fields |
| GitHub Issues | issue / task / bug / feature request | The output can be phrased as an actionable work item, preferably with a repo or data artifact target | "This feedback creates a trackable work item, but it only enters the dataset after it is linked back to an original paper or database source." | Indirectly strengthens tooling, keyword extraction, source hunting; conditional dataset entry |
| GitHub Discussions | open discussion / Q&A / announcement | The goal is asking for direction, clarifying scope, or gathering community pointers | "This feedback is useful for collecting leads and clarifying scope, but it is not dataset-ready until a downstream source citation is recovered." | Indirectly strengthens lead generation; not dataset-ready by itself |

使用规则

- PubPeer 是 direct 补强：反馈对象必须能锚定到 DOI / PMID / arXiv ID。
- GitHub Issues 与 Discussions 是 indirect 补强：先补强工具链、关键词、候选来源，再回流到原始文献或数据库。
- 若没有可追溯来源，就不要把反馈算作数据集条目，只能算公开线索。